Selling A.I. Art is cruddy...

 

Prompt colorful scumbag

    Art from Midjourney, Dall-E, Stable Diffusion, etc. has been in debate in recent times. These machine learning algorithms have studied art from well-known artists. Should they not be credited? People are selling A.I. art on sites like Etsy. Oh, it's nice to look at. The work has been created using a soulless algorithm. Folks who actually make artistic stuff have to compete with this crud. A.I. art can flood the market. People will pay attention to that art too. No doubt. Why pull at the strings of artistic integrity? That only solidifies the issues with using machine learning algorithms to make images because there will always be people who will take the least resistance and exploit stuff. Using A.I. for recreational, educational, or personal use is fine. Commercial use of A.I. is shady. At least transform it. Don't go to Craiyon.com, type a prompt for wood textures, and sell the images that the A.I. produces. Do people even want all those imperfections in the A.I.'s work? A.I. is never the problem, but those with the wrong intentions are. May these people make their own artwork.


    There is a zing or a zest, depending on how potent it is. Images from these neural networks are impressive in how they imitate life and human work, such as photography and the media arts. Once you put that to work, all of that special presentation becomes unraveled to see the industrial products that it is. What art is it in that? The A.I. images should be treated like scrap wood. If untransformed, it may not have value because it was made with little expense by the person who is trying to sell it. In a capitalistic society, the product should be able to be the most indistinguishable from its competition, or you might just plagiarize. If the people you are selling the images to can do the same thing, where is the value? If the image is unique, it was by chance, for the A.I. is tasked with making the images from a set of data, and it is picking from what it was fed, and then it puts what data it understands together in a picture. An algorithm can never try. It can only piece together the data that the person requested that it know. Whatever the result, it varies. Those highly impressionable results are from people before approving the result that resemble rational imagery, and not that person with the prompt. Humans don't "generate" like machines, for man and woman put their minds and souls into something beyond studying a set of images.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Not bad, Not Bad at all. - A.I.

Image
Victorian era, old photograph, hip hop woman with gold chains around neck      Artificial intelligence has upset a lot of people. Horrors and beauties not once made before The use of machine-based learning to make these pictures is up for debate. What has been rendered in the last few years varies. Deformed hands and messed-up lettering are things people mock AI for. For example, fair should be the word. Because the AI studied countless pictures with words in them, the AI would try to make pictures with words in them, but the words would be messed up, with rare instances where the AI got it right with short words. The machine-based learning was meant to study pictures, not words, but because the words are in those pictures, the AI would at times render pictures with words that don't exist. The lettering might even be messed up. Nonetheless, the feats of image mixing have made some outstanding art or imagery for those who see A.I. as a talentless artist that copies off the...
Read more

Odysee Site Review

lights126 11/21/21 Blogger Odysee Review      YouTube has grown tremendously over the years since 2005. The fun it was to just share nearly anything you wanted by video However, as time went on, the website restricted a lot of what people had to say or wanted to show. The hand of Susan Wojcicki had brought some distasteful servings that most of the userbase felt were unnecessary. This prompts the call for alternative websites for people to have more liberties there. Odysee is one of these sites today. On the use of Odysee, I am given more freedoms on the site than on YouTube. I feel that YouTube has a scale for suppressing content. Certain search results have a few videos. Odysee, if I wanted to search for controversial topics, I would receive a fair amount of results that would logically reflect on the common interest of warranting the subject. I am not a Flat Earther, but the content has been suppressed. If YouTube can allow views and teachings of both Christianity and...
Read more

I do visual designs.

Image
     Throughout my years in school, I have attended art classes. In my high school years, I made it my priority to have as many art classes as possible. I, too, was interested in computer science. I took programming classes. My objective is to be skilled in the areas in which I want to benefit. I now have some tools to achieve my desired tasks. If I work like I did when I was in high school, I can make many pieces for your purchase.   When you look at my work.      When I was in those art classes, I was tasked with doing homework to critique artwork and find out what the artist was or was trying to say to the viewer. Just like in literature, art has a purpose for being created. There is a message and a style of telling that message. Instead of the author, you have the artist. Instead of reading, you are viewing the work. Though a story can be made from anything because there is a beginning, middle, and end to the process in art, What would ...
Read more